AI agents are moving out of demos and into production, and many can now write to CRMs, ticketing systems, internal databases, and in some cases payment or account systems without a person approving every step. Compliance and risk teams have no reliable way to answer the basic questions when something goes wrong: what did the agent do, why did it do it, and did that action violate a policy the company is required to enforce. This product is a governance layer that sits between an agent and the systems it touches, checking every proposed action against the customer's own encoded policies and the relevant regulatory framework before the action executes, then logging a timestamped, plain-language record of what happened.
The buyer is a compliance, risk, or engineering leader at a mid-size or large company running agents in a regulated or sensitive workflow, such as a bank piloting an agent that can move money, a hospital letting an agent touch patient records, or an insurer using agents in claims decisions. These teams are already anxious about agent mistakes touching systems they are personally accountable for, and existing GRC tools were built for processes with a human at every step, not something that can take thousands of actions an hour.
The wedge is starting with one narrow, high-anxiety workflow per customer, the single agent action their risk team already loses sleep over, and becoming the tool their auditors expect to see evidence from. Pricing scales with the size of the agent fleet under governance, so revenue grows as a customer expands what its agents are allowed to do.