Investor decks fail in a predictable place: the product slides. Founders can tell the market story and the team story, but when the deck reaches "what have you built and is it working," the narrative goes soft — feature lists instead of evidence, cumulative charts instead of cohorts, a roadmap that reads like everything for everyone. That's the section VCs read most skeptically, and it's the section I fix.
Both sides of the table
I raised $150,000 in seed capital for Medzin, my healthcare startup, and grew it to 18,000+ users and Rs. 60L ARR — so I've sat in the pitch meetings and answered the uncomfortable follow-ups. I also spent eight years at CaaStle running growth product on a $30M–$50M ARR portfolio, producing exactly the funnel, retention, and unit-economics analyses that diligence teams request. I know which numbers investors will recompute themselves, because I've built the dashboards they recompute them from.
What we build together
- The metrics narrative: your retention cohorts, activation funnel, and growth efficiency assembled into an honest, coherent story — including how we frame the numbers that aren't pretty yet, which is where credibility is actually won.
- The product section of the deck: what you've learned, what you've proven, and why the next milestone is fundable — replacing the screenshot tour investors flip past.
- The data room: cohort tables, engagement definitions, and pipeline math prepared before they're requested, because diligence speed is a signal in itself.
- Q&A pressure-testing: I play the skeptical partner and ask the questions about churn, concentration, and CAC that you'd rather hear first from me.
The engagement runs two to four weeks alongside your raise prep. To be clear about boundaries: I don't broker introductions or take success fees — I make the product and traction story unbreakable, which is the part founders can least outsource to a designer.